Udovenko v Mitchell (1997) 79 FCR 418
This case considered the issue of the discretion of the court to go behind a judgment debt and whether or not a claim made by a solicitor for an unpaid bill that he had rendered to his client was sufficient to allow the court to issue a sequestration order.
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.