

Udovenko v Mitchell (1997) 79 FCR 418
This case considered the issue of the discretion of the court to go behind a judgment debt and whether or not a claim made by a solicitor for an unpaid bill that he had rendered to his client was sufficient to allow the court to issue a sequestration order.

- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase 
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.