![Student Law Notes - Legal notes for University studies](https://www.studentlawnotes.com/sites/all/themes/siteTheme/img/LG_StudentLawNotes.png)
![](https://www.studentlawnotes.com/sites/all/themes/siteTheme/img/GR_ArrowRed.png)
Udovenko v Mitchell (1997) 79 FCR 418
This case considered the issue of the discretion of the court to go behind a judgment debt and whether or not a claim made by a solicitor for an unpaid bill that he had rendered to his client was sufficient to allow the court to issue a sequestration order.
![](https://www.studentlawnotes.com/sites/default/files/law-notes-case-studies-9-large_85.jpg)
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase ![](/sites/all/themes/siteTheme/img/GR_Preview.png)
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.