Back to Legal Ethics

Smout v Smout [1989] VR 845

This case considered the issue of the duty of an advocate to act in the best interests of their client and whether or not remarks made in the final address to the court exceeded the interests of the client and amounted to a miscarriage of justice.

 

Share this case study

Like this case study

Smout v Smout [1989] VR 845
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.