data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0836/f0836a1931e9c3e9a176a5033817a751069f6db9" alt="Student Law Notes - Legal notes for University studies"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9cd8/a9cd860acb63488c69247c8484fd3d29c301f713" alt=""
Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141
The case of Rose v Plenty [1976] 1 WLR 141 considered the issue of vicarious liability and whether or not an employer of a milkman was vicariously liable for the negligence of a milkman and an injury sustained to a young boy and if the negligence of the milkman occurred during the course of his employment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99ad1/99ad187bf1174bd438864a696fa1b053387d3839" alt=""
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/780e5/780e54d5ad6c186351ee55a1516aea7a74caebed" alt=""
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.