Rondel v Worsley [1967] 3 ALL ER 993
This case examined the issue of immunity and confirmed that the paramount duty of a legal counsel is to the court and that they should not elevate their duty to their client above the duty to the court. It also confirmed the immunity that an advocate has by not being able to be sued for their actions in court if it is in the process of carrying out these duties to the court.
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.