Back to Legal Ethics
Rees v Sinclair [1974] 1 NZLR 180
This case considered the issue of immunity of an advocate in New Zealand and essentially follows the reasoning in the English case of Rondel v Worlsey.
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase 
This is the preview only.Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.