data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0836/f0836a1931e9c3e9a176a5033817a751069f6db9" alt="Student Law Notes - Legal notes for University studies"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9cd8/a9cd860acb63488c69247c8484fd3d29c301f713" alt=""
R v Fuge (2001) 123 A Crim R 310
This case considered the issue of claim of right in relation to larceny and whether or not it is available as a defence to an accessory even though it has not been raised by the principal offender. In addition, whether or not a direction by a judge was incorrect and resulted in the shift of onus of proof to the accused in relation to a witnesses motive to lie.