Back to Torts Law - Australia

Pitt Son and Badgery v Proulefco (1984) 153 CLR 644

This case considered the issue of intervening causes and whether or not a woolbroking company was liable for a fire which was caused in its warehouse on the basis that it was the actions of a third party who had started the fire. 

Share this case study

Like this case study

Pitt Son and Badgery v Proulefco (1984) 153 CLR 644
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.