data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0836/f0836a1931e9c3e9a176a5033817a751069f6db9" alt="Student Law Notes - Legal notes for University studies"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9cd8/a9cd860acb63488c69247c8484fd3d29c301f713" alt=""
Phillips v Whitely [1938] 1 All ER 566
This case considered the issue of negligence and whether or not a jeweller who pierced a womans ears should have a similar standard of care as a surgeon since the act of ear piercing was classified as a surgical operation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c698b/c698b37f853a2207088560545ca5e86b39fcc5db" alt=""
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/780e5/780e54d5ad6c186351ee55a1516aea7a74caebed" alt=""
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.