

Hawrish v Bank of Montreal [1969] SCR 515; 66 WWR 673; 2 DLR (3d) 600
This case considered the issue of parol evidence and whether or not evidence of a conversation between a solicitor and a bank manager was admissible that took place when the solicitor signed a continuing guarantee in relation to present and future debts of a company.

- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase 
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.