data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0836/f0836a1931e9c3e9a176a5033817a751069f6db9" alt="Student Law Notes - Legal notes for University studies"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9cd8/a9cd860acb63488c69247c8484fd3d29c301f713" alt=""
Gillespie Bros v Cheney, Eggar & Co [1896] 2 QB 59
This case considered the issue of implied terms and whether or not there was an implied term in a contract for the sale of coal as to the fitness for the purpose for which it was to be used.
This case considered the issue of implied terms and whether or not there was an implied term in a contract for the sale of coal as to the fitness for the purpose for which it was to be used.