Back to Legal Ethics
Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Pangallo (1993) 67 A Crim R
This case considered the claim of a solicitor that when found guilty of a criminal offence argued that he only admitted to the offence to get a lighter sentence.
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase 
This is the preview only.Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.