data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0836/f0836a1931e9c3e9a176a5033817a751069f6db9" alt="Student Law Notes - Legal notes for University studies"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9cd8/a9cd860acb63488c69247c8484fd3d29c301f713" alt=""
Newman v Phillips Fox [1999] WASC 171; 21 WAR 309
This case considered the issue of confidential information and whether or not a law firm could be permanently restrained for acting for one of their clients on the basis that the firm employed a practitioner who had previously acted for the party who was seeking the injunction and had brought proceedings against the law firms client.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6302d/6302d173aef7c83973e63ea624ca86f31416def4" alt=""
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/780e5/780e54d5ad6c186351ee55a1516aea7a74caebed" alt=""
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.