James v R-G (1967) 69 SR (NSW) 361

This case considered the issue of omitted easements and whether or not a correction to a title to include an easement that had been accidentally omitted by the registrar General was valid.

Share this case study

Like this case study

play
pause
stop
mute
unmute
max volume

repeat
repeat off

Title

Update Required To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.

This recording is subject to Copyright

Purchase

This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.