

Hunter v R (1999) 105 A Crim R 223
This case considered the issue of incompetence and conflict of interest and whether or not the level of a barrister’s incompetence when representing two men in relation to the same offence amounted to grounds for an appeal.

- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase 
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.