Back to Legal Ethics

Hunter v R (1999) 105 A Crim R 223

This case considered the issue of incompetence and conflict of interest and whether or not the level of a barrister’s incompetence when representing two men in relation to the same offence amounted to grounds for an appeal.

Share this case study

Like this case study

Hunter v R (1999) 105 A Crim R 223
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.