Hunter v R (1999) 105 A Crim R 223
This case considered the issue of incompetence and conflict of interest and whether or not the level of a barrister’s incompetence when representing two men in relation to the same offence amounted to grounds for an appeal.
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.