Back to Succession Law

Re Mills (1968) 88 WN (pt 2) (NSW) 74

This case considered the issue of dependent relative revocation and whether or not a revocation clause in a second will operated on the entire original will or upon each disposition distributively.  Specifically upon a residuary clause in the first will where the same clause failed in the second will.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Re Mills (1968) 88 WN (pt 2) (NSW) 74
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.