Back to Administrative Law - Australia

R v War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Bott (1933) 50 CLR 228

This case considered the issue of mandamus and whether or not a tribunal had denied a man an opportunity to present his case for a war pension entitlement and cross examine evidence against him when he was removed from the proceedings when the tribunal dealt with reports by medical experts.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

R v War Pensions Entitlement Appeal Tribunal; Ex parte Bott (1933) 50 CLR 228
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.