Back to Legal Ethics

Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Pangallo (1993) 67 A Crim R

This case considered the claim of a solicitor that when found guilty of a criminal offence argued that he only admitted to the offence to get a lighter sentence.

 

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Pangallo (1993) 67 A Crim R
Purchase
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.