data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0836/f0836a1931e9c3e9a176a5033817a751069f6db9" alt="Student Law Notes - Legal notes for University studies"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9cd8/a9cd860acb63488c69247c8484fd3d29c301f713" alt=""
Petelin v Cullen (1975) 132 CLR 355
This case considered the issue of non est factum and whether or not a man who could not read English could rely on the defence of non est factum in relation to a document that he signed, after he was told to sign it and not informed that it was a legally binding contract.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03539/035392e74fb77f55b304b23361d126de48ea8d20" alt=""
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4c3e/c4c3ebdfd3bd948965c8fcad10763c4888b14de7" alt=""
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.