Back to Torts Law - Australia

Levi v. Colgate-Palmolive Ltd (1941) SR (NSW) 48

This case considered the issue of abnormally sensitive plaintiffs and whether or not a company that manufactured bath salts had a special duty to a woman who suffered an allergic reaction to the use of the bath salts.

Share this case by email

Share this case

simple PHP captcha Refresh

Like this case study

Like Student Law Notes

Levi v. Colgate-Palmolive Ltd (1941) SR (NSW) 48
This is the preview only.
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.