![Student Law Notes - Legal notes for University studies](https://www.studentlawnotes.com/sites/all/themes/siteTheme/img/LG_StudentLawNotes.png)
![](https://www.studentlawnotes.com/sites/all/themes/siteTheme/img/GR_ArrowRed.png)
Jaensch v Coffey (1984) 155 CLR 549
This case considered the issue of reasonable forseeability in the context of a duty of care and also the issue of proximity when deciding whether or not a negligent driver was responsible for the sudden nervous shock sustained from witnessing her husbands serious injuries from a motor vehicle accident.
![](https://www.studentlawnotes.com/sites/default/files/law-notes-case-studies-2-large_61.jpg)
- Title
Update Required
To play the media you will need to either update your browser to a recent version or update your Flash plugin.
This recording is subject to Copyright
Purchase ![](/sites/all/themes/siteTheme/img/GR_Preview.png)
Please purchase to get access to the full audio summary.